项目计划编制(ProjectPlanning)
Project Managers and Strategic Thinking
Organizations select people to manage cross-functional projects based on their high levels of personal productivity and their ability to get things done. These PMs are typically task-oriented people with a strong sense of urgency and a keen focus on getting started and finishing. An organization typically needs its project managers to begin with the "blue sky" or conceptual thinking required to plan a project. Not too surprisingly, the inclination of most PMs is to skip the strategic phase of project management and to start the project.
The Activity Trap
Instead of thinking strategically to define the measurable results the project should achieve, the PM and her sponsor usually focus on the bells and whistles of the project's tasks. This is the activity trap, and it is an evil thing. When a PM dives head first into the gunk of the activity trap, the project planning takes the form of horse-trading. "Okay, if you can add your favorite task, then I get to add mine!" Most importantly, no one has agreed on what the project will achieve. After the project starts, tasks can change at the drop of a hat because there is no clear vision of the end result; everyone has their own idea. The project's scope and budget expand wildly as tasks are added because they sound like they should be part of the effort. The inevitable budget cutting is equally senseless. The thousands of decisions that people make during a project are not channeled toward a clear, measured result. The project manager doesn't find out about this desired strategic result until the project is almost finished and the stakeholders are unhappy.
It's no surprise that most bad projects -- particularly the ones that organizations repeat every few years -- are flawed because the front end planning is weak or was never attempted. It's up to the project manager to get the real definition of success before the project starts.
The PM must ask tough questions of the project sponsor and stakeholders: How will you measure success at the end of this project? What do you really want to buy for all this money we're going to spend? Getting answers to these questions forces the kind of conceptual thinking required at the front end of a project. Without an understanding of the desired result, the PM cannot fend off scope enlargement and define success for the people who will be doing the work. With answers to her strategic questions, the PM can drive the project toward the agreed upon measures of success.
A Different Kind of Thinking
Defining project success before you start requires conceptual thinking. We need to conceive a project as a linked chain of measured achievements. We create this chain by starting at the end of the project -- yes, the end. The last achievement is the sponsor's definition of success. This success definition needs to be measurable and preferably quantifiable.
"Provide the best possible customer service," is neither. Sure it sounds good and no one will disagree, but it's mush. We can't measure whether or not we have achieved this.
"Answer 95% of our customer's calls within 120 seconds," is measurable and quantifiable. People will argue about whether this is what they want and that's the point; we want to define good customer service before we start the project.
After a sponsor "buys off" on this second definition of success, we will not have to argue about whether or not we succeeded.
Let's go back and look at how a PM would develop this measure of success using this customer service example. As the PM, you're assigned a project which the sponsor describes as consisting of a new information system, training and installation for a customer service division that answers telephone inquiries. Immediately, you find yourself deluged with the technical details of hardware, programming and training that the new customer service system requires. As challenging and important as these are, they are only activities.
The success definition is not to install hardware and software. The success definition must be a strategic result. The sponsor wants to talk about activities. As project manager, you need to force a discussion of what the end result will look like in terms you and the sponsor can measure. After long discussions, you may finally unearth that the sponsor's real desire is to reduce the number of times that a customer problem is not solved on the first call.
- 1建筑工程项目管理软件
- 2软件项目管理工具
- 3项目管理系统
- 4工程行业科研项目管理系统
- 5工程项目管理软件下载
- 6开源项目管理系统下载
- 7工程项目管理
- 8多项目管理
- 9项目管理
- 10哪家项目管理好
- 11企业项目管理排名
- 12项目管理系统有哪些
- 1混凝土振捣操作规定
- 2坡屋面结构挂瓦施工工艺
- 3厨房卫生间地面改性聚脲防水涂料施工工艺
- 42015招标师《项目管理与招标采购》考前单选题分享3
- 52015年监理工程师《建设工程三大控制》练习题(17)
- 62015年咨询工程师考试《咨询概论》练习题(19)
- 72015年造价工程师考试辅导:工程造价相关概念
- 8医院庭院景观工程施工方案28p
- 92015年二级建造师新教材学习计划表
- 10招标师考试样题
- 11一级建造师管理与实务复习要点:沥青混凝土的概念
- 12一级建造师法规及相关知识复习要点:招标人与投标人
- 13名师达江解答二级建造师相关疑问——报名篇(四)
- 142015年监理工程师《建设工程合同管理》习题(13)
- 15考前最后24小时 需要准备什么
- 16沙浆泵五大特点您知道多少
- 172015年注册监理工程师《合同管理》模拟题(十二)
- 182015招标师职业水平考试,:我的招标师考试备考经验3
- 192015年造价员基础知识:弹性
- 202015年安全工程师相关法规模拟练习(12)
- 212015年咨询工程师《工程项目组织与管理》每日一练汇总3.4-3.10
- 222015年咨询工程师:专家会议预测法的3种形式
- 23造价工程师案例分析复习要点:税金
- 24广西:今年将竣工5条高速公路 走得更加顺畅
- 25土钉支护的失稳分析有几种
- 26券商资管"集合+信托" 定向输资逾百亿至一线城市房产
- 272015年监理工程师考试《工程合同管理》模拟试题(3)
- 282015年监理工程师《建设工程三大控制》练习题(34)
- 292015年咨询工程师《工程咨询概论》每日一练10.21
- 30黄山市2015年安全工程师考试报名时间为6月2日至11日
成都公司:成都市成华区建设南路160号1层9号
重庆公司:重庆市江北区红旗河沟华创商务大厦18楼